compstuff

So I mount the image via DISM or WTK, create a "drivers" folder in the sources folder, add my drivers (in a single folder or subfolders?) then unmount/save, create an ISO and do an install? Will that install the drivers? OR Mount the image with WTK, create a "drivers" folder in the sources folder, add my drivers (in a single folder or subfolders?) then unmount/save, create an ISO and do an install... WTK created a RunOnce that recognizes the "drivers" folder and installs them as needed during an installation. This drivers process is new to me so I apologize if the questions seem a little ignorant. EDIT: I see BrokenZer0 made a post on this as well http://www.wincert.net/forum/topic/12409-driverpacks-integration/?p=110458I will try and research further.

Lego you had mention previously that if I created a "drivers" folder in the root or" sources\\drivers" that the RunOnce would scan and install only whats needed but I am not quite sure how to actually create the RunOnce for this process. Do I use WTK to "integrate the drivers or is it another method. Any help would be appreciated.

Thank You!!!

Unfortunately I think your 100% correct and I too ONLY use free or paid.

I have been around for quite a few years working on "integration's" with the various tools and resources that have been available. Unfortunately the demands on all the developers is extremely high which has caused the early "retirement" of far too many of them. I am a FIRM believer that some form of financial "appreciation" should just be common sense and fair but unfortunately it's not. YES I do know that some of the developers have said they do not want donations and don't accept them BUT I still would like to show appreciation. I mean think about it... each of us are in different situations... some here need financial help more than others, some don't need it at all. If all the people that download and use these tools gave a small donation I am quite sure it would add up to something tangible for the developers. For those that don't want donations well... we all have holidays, birthdays, family etc... would it hurt any of us to donate the cost of a beer to show our appreciation. Yes I know I am rambling on so I will get back on point. I am all for a free and paid Pro version. I think if you give too much away free then people will simply not buy the pro version and in essence it will be a similar finical situation as your in now. If you make the price too high then it becomes prohibitive to far too many people. I personally think somewhere around $20.00 is a reasonable number. (that's about 2 drinks at a bar here in the US :-) ) ... even $30.00 is reasonable. Have you considered keeping v1 free and v2 paid? Many other software developers do that exact same concept.

Awesome work anytime you need a session just ask, its no problem at all. THANKS!!!

Yes we can do a session anytime I will PM the info... sent and ready anytime you want

Tried all 3 and none saw the WIM... yes I believe that only WIMs that I capture are not seen (I will capture a new one in about an hr and test further). I can see WIMS that are modified with KUC DISM offline.

I hate to even report this since I know your working on the more important new version but after version 1.5.1.5 I have a problem when I try to use AIO to find my WIM. The wims I am referring to are ones I make by mounting my VHD in windows and then using DISM to create them: dism /Capture-Image /ImageFile:C:\WIMs\install.wim /CaptureDir:E:\ /Name:"Windows 7 ENTERPRISE" /Description:"Windows 7 ENTERPRISE" /Compress:fast /CheckIntegrity /Verify v1.5.1.5 v1.5.2.6

I will test in about an hr when I get back home

Really made me smile... its not just me LOL

And your image had IE 11 integrated?

FYI: I have tried soo many thing for things and I really can't get it but you have a LOT more skills than I do so hopefully MS hasn't made this impossible.

When testing I do not rebuild the image so I can test faster but the option defaults to yes, can this be changed?

Hmmm I just finished a test and but I didn't get that... in fact I still got the same thing I posted here: http://www.wincert.net/forum/topic/12637-google-default-search-tweak-doesnt-work/?p=111360 Registry.txt google.ini

I reported back in the bugs section

Can't wait :w00t: trying 1.5.1.2 now Changelog

I had tried XML before with no luck but I never used the "ScopeKey" value. I will wait till Lego makes his next release since he thinks he solved it which is amazing since I spent countless hrs trying to get this ti work :prop:

I took a fully updated WIN7x64 image that has IE11 integrated and then ran WTK v25 to try and change the default search provider to Google. It adds the it but leaves Bing as the default. Settings.txt Registry.txt

Back in action :prop: Thanks

Tried version 18 and it won't open for me on WIN7x64 but version 17 does open Description: Stopped working Problem signature: Problem Event Name: CLR20r3 Problem Signature 01: wintoolkit.exe Problem Signature 02: 1.5.0.18 Problem Signature 03: 541dd071 Problem Signature 04: WinToolkit Problem Signature 05: 1.5.0.18 Problem Signature 06: 541dd071 Problem Signature 07: 4c8 Problem Signature 08: 3a Problem Signature 09: System.TypeInitialization OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.4 Locale ID: 1033

Thanks for the update Rick

I just downloaded using IE 11 Rebuilt Microsoft .NET Framework 4.5.2 Full x86/x64 and my MD5 matches

For some reason I always get a cookie error with my Chrome browser... I don't even bother to try and figure it out I just use IE 11 and download with no problems.

Thiersee you have an SSD as well as a ram drive and that's whats I have... I can't remember exactly because I do things differently now but what really made the difference for me is separating the the different temps and mount onto the different drives so your reading and writing from and to each of the drives. I think I used to read the hotfixes from my RAM drive to my SSD... try experimenting that way. Also speed test your ram drives I found HUGE performance differences between the 4 or 5 I tested and the fasted for me was the SoftPerfect.