Thiersee

I'm back ! WMF is not integrable offline: WTK detect it as to be moved under "Silent Install + SFX", but no matter if I put it under "Updates" (manually, before CR) or under Silent installers (moved by WTK), the ISO does not work: "Windows couldn't configure some components..." If it was under "Updates" after integrating it does not appear in tab "Integrated". And I say again: until the rollup of June it worked without issues (installed) after Win-Installation (WPI). If I see in the next months I need WMF, so I must install WIN with the ISO of June and then update. Anyway, it does not work with KB4025341 without the new request in WU. Not comparable with the old issue KB2533552/SP1 (only a part of SP1 was requested).

@rhahgleuhargh Then I have a question: why it has been working until now ???? You mean integrate all before CR + WMF, then loading the .wim again and integrate CR + all other KBs? I'm not sure, if it works: after the 1st integration were almost all marked with "install pending".... Then a second question: do I really need WMF 3.0 or higher (W7 contains 2.0)?

@rhahgleuhargh An hint for people using WMF 3.0 and higher. the last rollup KB4025341 seems to have problems with the Power Shell contained in every WMF-pack: if KB4025341 has been integrated and you install WMF after this KB (no matter if under Silent Installs+ SFX in WTK, with WPI or manually) WU asks again for this KB with full size! So I eliminated WMF 3.0 from my installation! I tested this with WMF 3.0 and 4.0 with the same results. On running systems no problem; BTW, KB4025341 contains a correction for WMF 3.0 and, after a deep-clean, another patch (KB2809900, part of WMF 3.0) will be uninstalled as superseeded.

And if you use the "Telemetry.exe" this KB will be hidden.

@pennsylvaniaron Because it's a new version ! Hide it.

Hi Liam, a small bug is still showing up on importing some driver in WTK 1.5.4.10: for example ASMedia-USB and AMD-Display are not seen by WTK, other driver don't have issues. If I import an older driver.ini with the same driver, they will be imported. With WTK 1.5.4.4 no problem at all.

@rhahgleuhargh MS has released a fix for IE11, KB4032782; my windows does not request it (yet); no idea, if they will be in the next rollup. Links from WHD (abbodi1406): http://download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/software/updt/2017/06/ie11-windows6.1-kb4032782-x64_cdbf2e7fc4bd6a38eb6330498546d025d301b09f.msu http://download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/software/updt/2017/06/ie11-windows6.1-kb4032782-x86_24bf5810314d61a8b23ca48580960f3de9e27574.msu Have a nice week end.

@keloo05 If you want you can use the repack from 4lfre1re (repack.net) or the maker from mooms (wincert.net)

And KB4019990 (prerequisite for NET-FW 4.7) should not be necessary anymore (read on an italian forum). Edit: Deep-Clean x86 (VM): no single KBs uninstalled, only Package for RollupFix~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~7601.23797.1.3 suprseded - uninstalled

Hi Liam, if you are still reading the forum, I have a bug integrating the drivers in the boot.wim: If you import the drivers directly in WTK/Drivers-TAB (I mean from my drivers-folder) they get a small icon in front of the line: if you go with the mouse on those marked lines you get a info-box with a MD5 and the info, that the driver will be installed in the boot.wim too. But, and this is a bug in my opinion, if you use a WTK.ini to import all your settings (Drivers and checked boxes under "Options" are listed!) the checked-Boxes under "Options" have no effect and the drivers are not integrated in the boot.wim! If you remove all the driver from the TAB and reload them importing a driver.ini (Load Drivers in Preset-Manager) then it works: the drivers get this small icons in front of the line (depending on which boxes under Options you checked) and are integrated in the boot.wim too.

@mooms I found the answer ! If you import the drivers directly in WTK/Drivers-TAB (I mean from my drivers-folder) they get a small icon in front of the line: if you go with the mouse on those marked lines you get a info-box with a MD5 and the info, that the driver will be installed in the boot.wim too. But, and this is a bug in my opinion, if you use a WTK.ini to import all your settings (Drivers and checked boxes under "Options" are listed!) the checked-Boxes under "Options" have no effect and the drivers are not integrated in the boot.wim! If you remove all the driver from the TAB and reload them importing a driver.ini (Load Drivers in Preset-Manager) then it works: the drivers get this small icons in front of the line (depending on which boxes under Options you checked) and are integrated in the boot.wim too. I'll open a bug-report on that in the bug-thread.

Download from Ricktendo have been moved to repacks.net, here the AIO: http://repacks.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=125&sid=37fbe69396f9ffdc57bf6611cf55acf0

@lolo03 Try to delete that update from your folder and download it again. No issues here.

Hi, just small questions about driver's integration with WTK: 1) what is the difference between integrate drivers in the install.wim or in the boot.wim? 2) In the WTK's options (AIO) there are some check-box for driver to integrate them in the boot.wim: if I check those options, will WTK integrate the drivers only in the boot.wim or in the install.wim too? Sorry for the question, but I've never used the option since the beginning of my work with WTK. Have a nice weekend.

Seems it depends on, how Windows has been installed (Classic or Convenience)... I just updated PC in Italy (installed 2013!) and KB2987107 has not been requested. On all other PCs (Convenience install) has been requested.

No, it isn't and in the UL is named "for NON ENGLISH Systems ONLY"; just have a look at link I posted yesterday .

Confirmed!

Exactly! I don't remember, sorry. I didn't; as I've seen that post, I had already done my integrations, but I can try to install it and do a deep clean.

@rhahgleuhargh did you see this post (#10005) from @abbodi1406? KB3210131

Net-FW 4.7 itself is optional, so the NFW-Repack from iCare is optional as that from Ricktendo, the only difference is, the one from Icare contains the prerequisite KB4019990, nothing more! If you don't install it, you don't need KB4019990! As I already said NFW 4.7 do not belongs to windows-installation, so it will not be in th UL.

@rhahgleuhargh Just a question: why KB4014579 instead of KB4014504 (see: post #9996 from Mr.X on MDL)? KB4019112 has been requested.

But not with other repacks, f.e. Ricktendo's , and possibly other not containing KB4019990.

Just discovered something interesting: on my wife's laptop (original install from HP, laptop is 6 month old, only updated) this "IE-Update" has never been requested !

Until yesterday KB3008923 has been requested by WU; this morning has WU changed "his opinion" and requested KB3003057; this evening again a change, requested was KB2987107. What are you doing, Microsoft ?

Hi @rhahgleuhargh & @X-Force just updated a VM x64 installed with the UL from april: 1st step: updated without KB3008923 and restarted, WU asks again for it. 2nd step: installed KB3008923 w/o issues, deep-clean it has not been "cleaned" (superseded). To show, how carefully MS prepared the patch-day: a little bit OT: NET-FW 4.7 already installed, but in the MS-info for KB4019112 no info about 4.7, only 4.6.2! Of course my mistake, KB4019112 refers to FW 3.5.1, sorry. Totally OT, but.... WU requested and installed KB3191843 (MS-Office 2010), calling the download manually says is for Office 2007... It means, I'll wait some days, before I update my working-systems here, especially my 3 system in Italy! Edit: today KB3008923 is not requested by WU anymore (it should be now only for IE10 & IE7..... - info from Microsoft Update Catalog) KB3003057 is requested instead (same year ) and this had replaced 2987107....