Jump to content

Thiersee

Ultimate Sponsor
  • Posts

    2,075
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Everything posted by Thiersee

  1. Sorry, I don't know what you do. As I said I integrate only the updates and I don't care about the WU requests for NFW 4.5.2 & 4.6.1; I install Windows on a VM (or HW) and when the installation has finished I start my WPI (WindowsPostInstaller) containing the NFW-Installer from @ricktendo (the international version, because I need IT & DE); after a WU-search I don't get any requests.
  2. Sorry @pennsylvaniaron, I used this time the integration with the "convenience pack", not the "Classic" and can't say, why you get the 4 patches requested again. Regarding the NFW here you get the actual version: http://www.wincert.net/forum/index.php?/topic/11127-microsoft-net-framework-461-for-windows-7/ As I said, I don't use the add-on, I use the exe-version during post-install and do not get the issue with KB3136000. Thiersee
  3. 1) You should integrate in a first session only updates and the 4 KBs under Silent-Installer-SFX; otherwise you can not say what is responsible for which issue! 2) The add on (WA) for NET-FW seems to be to old (20015.12.22) From my experience: do not put all at the same time in WTK!
  4. The installer from @ricktendo for NET-FW 4.6.1! I use an installer (I have no requests from WU!) and you an add-on (WA). I can't see what you do and what you integrate, so it would be helpful if you post your INI-file from WTK; otherwise it's not easy to help you, sorry!
  5. May be you have a look to the date of the posts about the issue with KB3136000.....it's more than three month! In the mean time there have been two updates for the installer and that issue don't come anymore.
  6. It dipends wich installer you are using to install NFW4.6.1; I use the installer from @ricktendo (not integrated, but installed silent after win installation) and I don't get any WU requests for it. http://repacks.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7 Regards, Thiersee
  7. @rhahgleuhargh Hi, there is a small copy/paste error in the actual list: Nice Sunday, Thiersee
  8. If it's related to the installation with your ULs, then please a document (pdf, doc, txt or whatever) in the first post, so if I link the topic to somebody it is only a link and he has all the needed info at the same place. Thanks, Thiersee
  9. I think nuhi knows about it, this problem exists since the beginning of NTLite (not observing the sequence you want); this is the reason, because I stopped using it...
  10. If you use only one language makes it no difference, the time to integrate is almost the same too. If you need more languages, then is the exe in my opinion better, because you have to care about one file pro language.
  11. To integrate IE11 with WTK you can use the .exe-file too; or you unpack the IExx.exe and integrate the cab/msu .
  12. KB2813347 is for RDP 8.1, the other are should be for the classic method with WTK; it means KB3020369 as first- & KB2670838 as second-prerequisite, then the "common" KBs before KB3125574 (components updated later by KB3125574). Can NTLite set the sequence the KBs are installed with? With the list in post #1 and Rollup.exe, to mask out the W10-related update I don't have issues, using WinToolkit. See you on WinLite too ! Thiersee
  13. If you remove the ei.cfg afterwards, you can work only on the version you have got the ISO for. If you remove the ei.cfg before you integrate updates, you integrate them in the version you choose; I never tried to integrate in all the versions available (and it would take very long!). If you want to integrate in all the version, follow this how to. BTW, my ISO with HP& Prof integrated is anyway bigger than 4 GB Regards, Thiersee
  14. KB3125574 needs KB3020369 (not ...609, it was a mistake) installed first! May be because of that it get a question mark.
  15. KB3020369 MUST be in the prerequisite, the other in the Silent Installer SFX! And you need an untouched Win7 ISO.
  16. Why did you put KB3161608 in the "Common"-category (filename 4-) but give him the category-id 3 (Classic)? I think, if common it should be category-id=2, shouldn't?
  17. Exactly, and because it wasn't asked by WU and I didn't get errors I thought it's installed and all is OK... It's good too, one update less in my package .
  18. What I mean is: I "installed" KB3042058 offline and I did not get some errors, but now proofing the installed updates (windows) I did not find it, it has not been installed, so DeepClean couldn't uninstall it.
  19. You are right, but as RunOnce; may be it's not necessary if KB3125574 will be used. I'll take it fro my "RunOnce Package".
  20. @rhahgleuhargh June-Rollup KB3161608 released and offered by WU http://forums.mydigitallife.info/threads/19461-Windows-7-Hotfix-repository/page1061?p=1240038 Edit: A DeepClean should uninstall (MDL-article) KB3042058 and KB3139940, but: 1) KB3042058 has NOT been installed on ALL the test installations (with Convenience Rollup Pack!) I made in the last days, even if it was in the list to be installed. 2) KB3139940 is in the UL only for the classic way to install. In my working PC (installed middle of april) are both installed. Thiersee
  21. In another pass, started after Win7-Install and last reboot. No, they are not deep-cleaned!
  22. And exactly this is the reason, because I do not integrate them, I install them later .
  23. You don't need an extra-msu to do a deep clean! Either you goes on Start, Search for "cleanmgr.exe" and start it or you go on "Computer", right-click on your System Drive (usually C:) and select "Properties", then click on the "Button" (I think in english is "Clean"). Thiersee
×
×
  • Create New...