Thiersee

Could be; you can post your tweaks-ini.

Hi, searching for info about KB3083324 I found this threads on anandtech.com: very interesting and helpful! http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?p=37678252 http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2444042 Regards, Thiersee

WU asks today for KB3083324; in WHD it is marked for W10. Thiersee

For me it works! Thiersee

Hi rhahgleuhargh, KB2990214, KB3050265 (both in the ULs) & KB3065987 (replaced by KB3075851 but still in .vbs-script) seem not to be requested by WU anymore. On a fresh installation I first run the .vbs-script to hide all the W10-KBs: 10 KBs went under "Hidden"; then I restored them and WU did not ask for them, only for 7 KBs (BTW, the same classified as W10 in WHD). Have a nice week end. Thiersee Edit: Of course, just after this post WU asked for KB3065987 (may be because kb3075851 has been hidden) :ranting: :ranting: :ranting:!

If you work with Windows 7, Windows USB/DVD Download Tool very good too. I build the ISO with WintoolKit and "burn" it on USB-media without any problem. Thiersee

In this case please don't forget post #825 & #826.... Just downloaded and the name-issue is still present (x86). Thiersee P.S.: have a look here, post #10074.....

No problem, I already corrected my list on my own. About KB3075249: WHD classified it as W10-related. Another small confusing issue: KB2813347 (posts #810/#812): even if this KB isn't a RDP update, it's confusing when a user sees 9 RDP 8.1-related KBs in the list (and WUD) but only 8 in the download folder.

In the actual UL (x86) has still the name ADD-.... <update id="KB3040272" category="1" publishdate="2015-06-16" article=" http://support.microsoft.com/kb/3040272"> <title>KB3040272 - MAJ pour Windows 7 SP1 x86</title> <description>Le temps de démarrage augmente si un autre pack de langue est installé.</description> <filename>ADD-Windows6.1-KB3040272-x86.msu</filename> <url>http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/F/7/2F73142C-D183-45E0-974F-14A1424E1ADE/Windows6.1-KB3040272-x86.msu</url> </update> It's only a bit confusing . the x64-UL is OK.

Me too! BTW, KB3077715 too is not really needed in Europe General changes made by this updateThe following changes were made since the previous Windows cumulative time zone update: Pacific SA Standard Time For 2015 and going forward, Chile will remain in DST. (No DST change will be observed.) Therefore, the UTC offset for Chile is updated to UTC-3:00, and the display name of the "Pacific SA Standard Time" time zone is updated to "(UTC-3:00) Santiago." (3039024)Iran Standard Time Iran follows the Persian calendar. This cumulative update corrects the DST data for "Iran Standard Time" in Windows for the years 2015 through 2024. (3049874)Eastern Standard Time (Mexico) The Mexican state of Quintana Roo has moved from UTC-6:00 to UTC-5:00 "(UTC-05:00) Chetumal." This time zone is newly introduced and will not observe DST. (3049874)Montevideo Standard Time On June 30, 2015, the Uruguayan government decided to abolish the observance of daylight saving time. This put the country into the UTC-03:00 time zone all year round.Ulaanbaatar Standard Time Mongolia will observe DST starting in 2015. DST for Mongolia starts on the last Saturday of March at 02:00 and ends on the last Saturday of September at 00:00. The following DST rules will be observed. (3049874) But to keep the TimeZone consistent...

Hi rhahgleuhargh, I think the replaced KBs should still be present in the ULs as needed, because they have been replaced by optional updates: if somebody does not install optional updates, then will still need the replaced, don't you mind? Or you move this two optional updates to the section of the needed, in the same way like KB3077715. Thiersee

@bphlpt, For me too. Thiersee

I just finished an x64-integration (professional) and as in the past KB2533552 has been not directly requested by WU, just a small amount of SP1 with the same size of KB2533552, as usual. In this case it's enough to install KB2533552 and after a new search WU doesn't ask for SP1 anymore; for x86 exactly the same. Thiersee

If it is in the RDP 8.1-section, I think the name should be RDP-Windows6.1-KB2813347-x64.msu, or not? Thiersee BTW, the wrong file KB3078601 made me creasy, now it's OK; it made the update search extremely slow and some RunOnce did not run, wether in WTK nor with WPI!

Bingo! I downloaded it now directly from MS Update-Catalog and the files, both x64 and x86, and the size is a bit bigger (700 Byte for x86) and has another checksum (the same as in the file-name); of course I tried again with the link from Bulletin MS15-080 and the file is exactly the same like on patch-day! Many, many thanks Microsoft, two days work for nothing :ranting:. Of course I tried a couple of the other updates: no issue, the problem was only with KB3078601! Good, I'll start another integration...and to be on the safe site I download now ALL again. Thiersee @rhahgleuhargh: I'm extremely curious, which link you write in the UL...

What do you mean with "good file"? Which one is the goog one? Sorry, but I don't know anymore... :sad02: TNX, Thiersee

Have a look to post #10062 from abbodi1406 on MDL: I've installed it: no problem! Thiersee

The problem is, in this case, not wich way to the info you choose (both MS- & Update-Catalog are the same), but the link you choose in the info: through the bulletin (in the summary) you get KB3078601, through the direct download (download method 2, in the same info!) you get KB3045685 and this is definetly wrong. Thiersee

What do you mean with WUC? I think Windows Update Catalog, or not? I downloaded the KB with the link in Bulletin MS15-080 at the top, in the Summary; To the MS-Bulletin I went with this link The two links to the MS-Download-Center (Download Method 2) are on my opinion wrong, because they redirect to KB3045685 (Bullettin MS15-038 from April 2015)! Thiersee

I just started the installation, where KB3078601 is asked, and will install one after the other all the KBs I did not install (replaced by KB3078601). If WU asks again for it, could be it's for the RunOnce. BTW, on my working PC it has not been asked, only new installation.

not installed it Of course, has not been installed! The update has just come yesterday and ricktendo's-repack is from 20-07-2015 .

WU did not ask me for that, but I've another problem: it asks for KB3078601, even it is installed; I don't know, could be I made a mistake :sad02: . I keep on testing. Thiersee

Skype 7.8.0.102 released: http://download.skype.com/msi/SkypeSetup_7.8.0.102.msi Thiersee

The question after the patch-day is only: MS "waked-up" and says KB3060716& KB3071756 (new) replace KB3067505, but this one has already been replaced by KB3057154: do the new KBs replace KB3075154 too???? Thiersee P.S.: I know, you don't like WU....

I think WU asks for KB2952664 but not only this one!) sometimes as optional (this time was a "minor" version), sometimes as important (last time, change from -v12 to -v13). Anyway I noticed that WU asks for the same update if his version has changed, even if that update has been hidden (for example W10-related KBs). Thiersee