Thiersee
-
Posts
2,075 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
65
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Thiersee
-
[Slim] .NET Framework 4.6.1 Full x86/x64 (2-27-2016)
Thiersee replied to ricktendo's topic in Installer Repacks
Same here with Cyberfox 34.0.5. But SOMETIMES it is necessary, for me, to use a download-manager (I use FDM); I don't know why only sometimes. Happy New Year to everybody Thiersee -
Hi Lego, check your bank-account (starting on wednesday) . Thiersee
-
Hi mooms, 1) In the english batch-file there is a small section still in french: 2) If I start the maker on a system, where the actual version is already installed, I get a small error-warning that a newer version is already installed on the system; this warning disappears on his own. Regards, Thiersee BTW: Happy New Year! :beerchug:
-
Hi trash491, "Silent switches" are marked as "Not needed", not the KB itself! Thiersee P.S.: Buon Anno Nuovo!
-
Hi rulman, are you in the right forum ? Anyway: KB3004394 has been taken from update-server, because it was causing problems KB2993651 has been replaced by a newer version (6.1.1.2 by 6.1.1.3, the update after this in the list) KB3000988 has been replaced by KB3008627 Thiersee
-
I see the picture !
-
Hi Lego, what does it mean? It appears on every WTK-Start. Thiersee
-
Yes; I tought too (post #362) that an installed KB3008923 is a prerequisite for KB3025390. It has been integrated and installed; it means it's not right, what MS says in the KB-article. Thiersee
-
Just tested integration/installation W7 HomePremium x86 (VirtualBox): neither KB976002 (browser choice) nor KB3025390 have been asked again by WU! Thiersee
-
Yes, sir!
-
No problem at all! Thiersee
-
It seems that KB976002 (Browser choice) is not necessary anymore, the KB has taken from MS-Update-Catalog! The 5 years limit from the EU are over! I've only an article in german, sorry! Or Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrowserChoice.eu Thiersee
-
@rhahgleuhargh I did a test (HomePremium x64, italian): without KB3008923 (uninstalled, not a new installation!) WU does NOT ask for KB3025390, then I installed KB3008923 again and WU asked again for KB3025390. Regards, Thiersee
-
It could be, that this update can NOT be integrated, because you need KB3008923 installed! Integrated update have the state "Install pending" after integration with WTK; may be you must put it into RunOnce. Regards, Thiersee
-
rvkroots.exe /Q. Thiersee
- 60 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- 2.0.5641.41562
- 2.0.5642.1187
- (and 79 more)
-
http://forums.mydigitallife.info/threads/19461-Windows-7-Hotfix-repository/page971 Thiersee
-
Normally WU asks for KB976932 SP1 with that size if KB2533552 has NOT been installed; after installing it disappears SP1 too. Google Translate : Normalement WU demande KB976932 SP1 avec cette taille si KB2533552 ne est PAS installé; après l'installation de SP1 il disparaît aussi.
-
Yes, I did it and yes, kb3006625 has been uninstalled (superseded). BTW, but nothing to do with this and with the ULs: the MS "never ending story" continues: Silverlight-update (taken from server the day after patch-day) has been asked again (higher version) by WU...... Thiersee
-
Hi rhahgleuhargh, I give up with KB3006625, I put it again in the UL! I installed now three times always with the same result: 1) Install with only UL-updates but without KB3006625, with IE11 and RDP; restart, WU-search, it asks obviously for KB3006625 2) One after the other (and for each every time restart and a new search!) all the KBs from WU and from my list I install with WPI (KBs and system-related programs): WU asks always for KB 3006625. 3) Install like point 1) and then my whole list with WPI: WU does NOT ask for KB3006625 anymore! As I said, I give up, I can't find The reason: my be the sequence or a program, I don't know . Thiersee
-
Some of he link-descriptions on the site are wrong! 1st link NOT W7 x86 ------> Update for Windows Server 2008 R2 for Itanium-based Systems (KB3024777) 2nd link NOT W7 x64 ------> Update for Windows 7 (KB3024777) 3rd link OK W7/Server 2008 R2 ------> Update for Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems (KB3024777) Thiersee
-
Exactly this caused my mistake ... for x64: KB2533552 KB2603229 KB2685811 KB2685813 KB2506143 KB2809215 KB2809900 KB2823180 for x86: KB2533552 KB2685811 KB2685813 KB2506143 KB2809900 KB2823180 After installing this updates WU does not ask for KB3006625. Thiersee
-
Hi rhahgleuhargh, First point: I have a very strange issue with WUD and the ULs 30-11-2014 and 09-12-2014 for both architecture: I can NOT load the four lists at the same time, the one overwrites the other! I explain exactly (I hope): I load for example both list for the 30-11-2014 and they appear in WUD; after that I load both lists for the 09-12-2014 and they appear in WUD, but the the others from 30-11-2014 DISAPPEAR! If I load "crosswise", i.e. x64 from 30-11-2014 and x86 from 09-12-2014 no problem; with older list (11-11-2014 and 18-11-2014) no isssues! I unpacked all four lists and opened with Notepad++ to compare the contents I read at min 10 times the lists, but I did not find any error. 2nd point (not an error!) KB3006625: have you read my post #317? I've just finished an installation (real HW, x64) with all my not integratable KBs and again WU did NOT ask for this update! If I install with only the update from the UL, WU asks for it. Thiersee Edit: first point: MY FAULT ! Thiersee
-
To my post #305: Forget this point, please! On my 2 working PCs this request does not appear, probably due to other Updates/programs installed. If I make a fresh installation with only the updates from the UL (Windows, IE11, RDP) and make then an update-search, KB3006625 appears as "important", in the same way like SP1 (a small part) if KB2533552 has not been installed. With a complete installation with all the non integratable updates, driver, programs and so on KB3006625 is NOT requested by WU. The issue with KB3004394 remains. Thiersee
-
This is the best idea! Thiersee