Kelsenellenelvian

I have contacted your web provider and sent a cease and desist order asking for the removal of your comments on this matter or you blog be shut down since you refuse to allow us to defend ourselves there. Just to prove I am serious your provider is: Sky Broadband And they control the ip range of: 2.223.0.0 - 2.223.255.255 Plus this is their contact information: BSkyB Broadband Hostmaster:Sky Network Services1 Brick LaneLondonE1 6PUUK+44 20 7032 7000+44 20 7900 7812In conclusion = WinToolkit itself does not contain malware! You were a idiot for using the installer version when you were warned by your anti-virus.

Also the trusted installer is actually necessary for modifying a windows mounted image. Once again IT professional? http://helpdeskgeek.com/windows-7/windows-7-how-to-delete-files-protected-by-trustedinstaller/

That is the issue you installed a version your av told you had questionable binaries in it. That is your own dumb fault. Had you used the portable version there is NO malicious software in it at all!!! I am not contradicting your statements only proving you are a idiot (IT Professional huh?) for not listening to your av software. Wintoolkit by itself is completely safe the adware is ONLY contained in the installer. Also you are really a coward by not showing any of this conversation on your blog. Have the balls to show your readers our defense.

While this may not be very polite and I know he will delete all of the comments on his blog I HIGHLY encourage everyone who reads this to post your opinion and thoughts on this to his blog in any way you wish. http://andrum99.blogspot.co.uk

For your record I am over 40, started working on computers in the age of commodore 64 machines, have my own tech website and a freeware open source program that has been actively downloaded tens of thousands of times a month for 10 years (Not some dumb blog) I also get over 12,000 Google hits directly related to my name and works with windows, windows customization and programming.

He banned me from his blog. Poor guy. I believe kapersky flagged it I SAID the INSTALLER version contains adware. I ALSO told you there is a exe file only version that has NO installer or adware. Which you seem to continue ignoring the fact of...

I called him out for not investigating the matter fully (The 7z file) and also for defaming WinCert by his posts here to avoid this site. I also said we never denied the adware in the installer. As a "IT Professional" to act like this is quite well, ummm unprofessional. Is was extremely polite and professional in my posts on his blog. He apparently didn't want his blog readers to see how full of crap he was.

He removed my comments on his blog. This guy barely looks 30 and claims he has 20 years it experience and acts like a child. I am not going to ban him and give him the satisfaction he is looking for, but by deleting my comments off of his blog he proves he is full of crap.

Not denying anything there is adware in the installer, however did you notice there is a 7zip package no installer version??? Your insinuation that people should avoid this site is very troubling as you (Especially claming to be a "Expert") failed to fully investigate this matter. Posted a reply on your blog.

What about the .net version?

Also if you are selling Windows iso's with customization and other apps included you are in extreme violation of forum rule #1 1. This is not a warez site! Links or Requests to warez and/or illegal material (porn, cracks, serials, braindumps, etc..) will not be tolerated. Discussion of circumventing WGA/activation/timebombs/keygens or any other illegal activity will also not be tolerated. Advertising is strongly forbidden here. If you ignore any of the aforementioned you will be banned without previous notice.Forum rules = http://www.wincert.net/forum/topic/2-wincertnet-forum-rules/ Redistribution of windows iso's without permission of Microsoft is against the law in most countries and WinCert has to follow these laws by not assisting with or allow it to be discussed. Otherwise wincert can loose it's servers and ad driven revenue. Plus from looking at your example picture some of that software is not redistribute-able without the permission of the parent company.

vLite and nLite have a very strict no business corporate use license. I have suggested he go by this policy too for this very reason. You're simply trying to steal lego's hard work and sell it as your own. Copyright doesn't refer to just pictures. It also refers to the intellectual property of Wintoolkit and the wintoolkit runonce program. Laziness is not an excuse for deception and blatent thievery of someone elses work.

That's kinda rude to lego and all of his hard work isn't it?

Start with a full version?

Thanks m8

I'm actually doing quite well, I have the opportunity to get my own house (Trying to raise the funds for the taxes and papers) I need $1000 total and I have only gotten $160 via a yard sale I had this weekend. My health is not too bad either.

If I may be so bold.

How about "Output Location"?

Sweet!

Super

Spanx dood....

I like that solution.

There is but it makes no sense for the discard button to even kick of rebuilding at all.

Just the plain old wim manager

Hey lego? Why in the heck does discarding images still kick off the rebuilding wim option? If I am discarding a image then the wim doesn't need rebuilt does it?