yogurt Posted November 15, 2012 Posted November 15, 2012 (edited) Windows Toolkit does not copy the apps folder over to the target drive like WPI. With Win Toolkit the Apps / Installers folder is executed from the install media. WPI can be made to copy the installer files over to the target drive prior to executing the installers. It would be nice if Windows Toolkit could do the same. This would allow for users to span their install.wim over multiple DVD's / CD's without breaking the integration of silent installs.Windows Toolkit as of 1.4.0.77 has a component to split a WIM to span over multiple DVD's but with limitations. See what I mean? Edited November 22, 2012 by dotfusion Quote
Etz Posted November 21, 2012 Posted November 21, 2012 Actually thats the only reason why I prefer WinToolkit installer to WPI, less post-install clutter on SSD Quote
Kelsenellenelvian Posted November 21, 2012 Posted November 21, 2012 What are you guys smoking?WPI doesn't copy files over. It can be made to do so but that standard practice was dropped 8+ years ago.It is much cleaner and faster to have the install files and scripts stay on the source.There is only 1 file left on the drive directly from WPI and even that can be disabled (The log file)WHO told you this drivel? Quote
yogurt Posted November 22, 2012 Author Posted November 22, 2012 (edited) It's as you say Kel, WPI can be made to copy files over to the target system drive prior to executing. I have edited my post to be clear that WPI does not copy files to the system driver by default. Sorry for the confusion folks.What are you guys smoking?WPI doesn't copy files over. It can be made to do so but that standard practice was dropped 8+ yearsIt is much cleaner and faster to have the install files and scripts stay on the source.There is only 1 file left on the drive directly from WPI and even that can be disabled (The log file)WHO told you this drivel? Edited November 22, 2012 by dotfusion Quote
Kelsenellenelvian Posted November 22, 2012 Posted November 22, 2012 Actually thats the only reason why I prefer WinToolkit installer to WPI, less post-install clutter on SSD Let me clarify the WPI "Standard" use for you. The whole WPI folder resides at the root of your source. When WPI runs it only deposites a couple of txt files (Very small) during running and runs the scripts, installers and regfiles straight from the source. Then only the log file is left after a installation. With the click of a couple of options there would be nothing of WPI left after installation of the options carried in WPI. Quote
Etz Posted November 22, 2012 Posted November 22, 2012 (edited) What are you guys smoking?WPI doesn't copy files over. It can be made to do so but that standard practice was dropped 8+ years ago.Last time I actually used WPI was 8+ years ago, so sorry didnt know that fact... :shy:I misinterpreted it from the first post that it still does it today.Still I`m not a big fan of concept, that all installers get copied to destination drive before actual install happens...Let me clarify the WPI "Standard" use for you. The whole WPI folder resides at the root of your source. When WPI runs it only deposites a couple of txt files (Very small) during running and runs the scripts, installers and regfiles straight from the source. Then only the log file is left after a installation. With the click of a couple of options there would be nothing of WPI left after installation of the options carried in WPI.Thx for the clarification, will probably look to it again, because it definately is great option to do installations,especially if you dont want to modify anything else in installation image.Also it felt pretty flexible already back then... Edited November 22, 2012 by Etz Quote
yogurt Posted November 23, 2012 Author Posted November 23, 2012 (edited) ** Removed **Sorry wrong topic. Edited November 23, 2012 by dotfusion Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.