quetzalin Posted September 20, 2014 Posted September 20, 2014 (edited) After installing the last pack on a fresh Windows 7 32bit Windows Update asks for the update KB2858725 . It is offered as an OPTIONAL update tho. Don't know if this update is already superseded or you just forgot to include it. Edited September 20, 2014 by quetzalin Quote
ricktendo Posted September 20, 2014 Author Posted September 20, 2014 Its not an update its a language pack, use the INTL version which includes the language pack for your language Windows Quote
quetzalin Posted September 21, 2014 Posted September 21, 2014 Its not an update its a language pack, use the INTL version which includes the language pack for your language Windows Even with the INTL version i still get that update on a fresh Windows 7, i just tested it again on a virtual machine. And after installing that optional, i get the next important updates: KB2894854, KB2931368, KB2972216, KB2901126 and KB2898869 . I never had this problem before with your packs. Quote
biatche Posted October 23, 2014 Posted October 23, 2014 rick is this rebuilt version no longer being maintained? i see several windows update security fixes. Quote
gladwin Posted November 2, 2014 Posted November 2, 2014 halo ricktendo , may i know will release the new " [Rebuilt] .NET Framework 4.5.2 Full x86/x64 " , saw the date is (9-19-2014) but the slim installer date is (10-15-2014) , is it will release the new KB2996568 for the .NET Framework 4.5.2 Full x86/x64 ? Quote
niTe_RiDeR_Pr0 Posted December 31, 2014 Posted December 31, 2014 I can't understand one thing. i want to integrate .net framework 4.5.1 to my win8.1 x64 iso. using WUD (windows updates downloader0, i downloaded the .netfx 4.5.1 msu (Windows8.1-KB2934520-x64.msu), the size is 42.97MB. Previously I had download the file NDP452-KB2901907-x86-x64-AllOS-ENU.exe. (original installer, not your repack). I extracted the files of the exe setup using 7-zip and saw a file named 'x64-Windows8.1-KB2934520-x64.msu". Both are the same kb's, but why are they having different file sizes? :g: Very strange , I am confused which one to integate. So please tell me the differences and which one to integrate. thank you. Quote
ricktendo Posted December 31, 2014 Author Posted December 31, 2014 Compression is less on the MSU in the original EXE so the installer can compress better(smaller) Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted December 31, 2014 Posted December 31, 2014 (edited) @niTe_RiDeR_Pro,Windows 8.1 has .net framework 4.5 included so you don't need to integrate it to your ISO.This installer is for Windows 7 and Vista only.Only .net FW updates are needed for Windows 8.1, not the installer. Edited December 31, 2014 by rhahgleuhargh Quote
niTe_RiDeR_Pr0 Posted December 31, 2014 Posted December 31, 2014 @niTe_RiDeR_Pro,Windows 8.1 has .net framework 4.5 included so you don't need to integrate it to your ISO.This installer is for Windows 7 and Vista only.Only .net FW updates are needed for Windows 8.1, not the installer.Thanks for the info, andHappy New Year to everybody! Quote
f483755 Posted September 15, 2015 Posted September 15, 2015 are KB3074230 and KB3074550 going to be integrated? Quote
ricktendo Posted September 17, 2015 Author Posted September 17, 2015 Sorry, not updating this anymore (hard to maintain and more people use the slim) alfreire 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.