May 15, 201311 yr Are there any possible implications by not having the full .net installer saved on the hdd? There's nothing for me to stay true to, just a matter of practicality of which saves space, does the job (quicker), and cause no problem. My question for this is, there are times in XP where when some files are missing, it looks for the installer and if the installer is missing (such as when they were on an old share), it'd give a popup looking for the installer. Given there are no implications, the slim is of course the best way to go. Sorry to complicate simple matters, but it's good for me to know. Thanks! Edited May 15, 201311 yr by biatche
May 15, 201311 yr Author No issues, you get the FULL framework/functionality in both cases...slimming only breaks netfx repair and install/uninstall GUI
May 15, 201311 yr Rick, I notice you don't list KB2804582. Is that because it is replaced by a newer patch? It's showing a release date of yesterday.http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2836440 Resolves a vulnerability in the Microsoft .NET Framework that could allow identity spoofing on a client system.2804582 MS13-040: Description of the security update for the .NET Framework 4.5 on Windows 7 Service Pack 1, Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1, Windows Vista Service Pack 2, and Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2: May 14, 2013http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2804582 If it's superseded, which update replaces it?Thanks! Edited May 15, 201311 yr by Mr_Smartepants
May 15, 201311 yr Author The two (I am sure that one) I added today I think supersede itLook at the LDR file names/versions of all 3 new updates
May 15, 201311 yr I uninstall previous .NET, try to install this one, and the installer tell me that is not for my computer.I'm running Windows 7 (64). Also I try to repack with "/q" ,and doesn't work
May 16, 201311 yr Do you extract it?If so, dontI run the installer, and is only for x86, not for 64 systems (?)
May 16, 201311 yr Author My bad...I rebuilt installer with the SFX from the x86 only installer. Currently uploading proper installers For the time being you can try and extract the installers and run: Setup.exe /x86 /x64
May 17, 201311 yr Rick, I notice you don't list KB2804582. Is that because it is replaced by a newer patch? It's showing a release date of yesterday.http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2836440 Resolves a vulnerability in the Microsoft .NET Framework that could allow identity spoofing on a client system.2804582 MS13-040: Description of the security update for the .NET Framework 4.5 on Windows 7 Service Pack 1, Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1, Windows Vista Service Pack 2, and Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2: May 14, 2013http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2804582 If it's superseded, which update replaces it?Thanks! No one!If I install the Slim-Pack (Intl.) windows-update downloads KB2804582. @ricktendoThe two (I am sure that one) I added today I think supersede ithave a look at my post here.
May 17, 201311 yr After installing the .NET Framework [Rebuilt] 4.5 Full x 86/x 64 (5/16/2013),the program requires CD with netfx_FullLP_x64..This function is not needed.
May 17, 201311 yr Author @Thiersee make sure you have the latest version by checking the MD5, if they dont match re-download @Yventaliy I am not sure I understand what you mean exactly by "requires CD"
May 17, 201311 yr After installing dotNetFx45_Full_x86_x64_Repack.exe, Setup prompts you to install the language pack that is not desired.
May 17, 201311 yr @Thiersee make sure you have the latest version by checking the MD5, if they dont match re-downloadI use the slim version with language packs (80.5 MB), not the rebuilt; the download is from 14.05.2013 and there is no newer!
May 17, 201311 yr @Thiersee make sure you have the latest version by checking the MD5, if they dont match re-downloadI use the slim version with language packs (80.5 MB), not the rebuilt; the download is from 14.05.2013 and there is no newer! @Thiersee, then I'm confused. Why are you posting in this thread rather than this one, where I assume the version you are trying to use is located? Cheers and Regards
May 17, 201311 yr @Thiersee, then I'm confused. Why are you posting in this thread rather than this one, where I assume the version you are trying to use is located? I've already posted in that thread: no answer at all!
May 17, 201311 yr Author What is the MD5 of the installer you have? Something tells me you are using an old installer, redownload
May 18, 201311 yr What is the MD5 of the installer you have?Something tells me you are using an old installer, redownloadI don't know the MD5 and I downloaded it on 15.05.2013.But it's no a problem anymore:don't ask me how and why it works now, I installed 3 different Win7 (1 DE-x64 Prof, 1 DE-x86 HP, 1 IT-x64 HP) and there has been no downloding of KB2804582 by windows update!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.