I've asked you here to sort the updates in Microsoft's way, with KB9xxxxxxx first, and only then KB2xxxxxxx. I've repeated this obsessively in various threads because I didn't wanted you to implement the alphabetical sorting, that wrongfully puts KB2xxxxxxx before KB9xxxxxxxx. And just what I feared has happened.

 

If you cannot make the sorting by name to put KB9xxxxx first, then please remove the sorting by name ''feature''. It was better before without this sorting, when I could integrate the KBs directly from explorer in the right order.

It only sorts when you click the columnheader.

Ah I see what the issue is... The only way I would get it to work is if i turned KB9XXXXX into KB09XXXXX and have a leading 0.

 

UPDATE: Seems to work nicely when I add a leading 0.

Don't believe it 'till I see it in a test build.

Test build up, with red update fix too.

Can confirm that now everything is ok in test 4. Thanks.

No problem