Legolash2o Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Update catalog will be replaced by Windows Hotfix Downloader. Alphawaves has given me permission to use his update lists. I will start programming this after my Tuesday exam Tuesday77 1 Quote
ricktendo Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Greate news, thanks to alphawaves and the update list maintainers Quote
RicaNeaga Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Yeah, great news!!! Also like to thank all the members involved in WHD, especially Alphawaves and abbodi1406!!! Quote
Falo Posted January 12, 2014 Posted January 12, 2014 Hi!Can't open Windows Hotfix Downloader.It says Out of memory, how much does it need?I have a quad core x64 comp. with 4gb ram and Win7.Any suggestions? Quote
Legolash2o Posted January 12, 2014 Author Posted January 12, 2014 Falo, Windows Hotfix Downloader is not in WinToolkit yet? The only thing in it is opening a link to its website :/ Quote
RicaNeaga Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Just wanted to bump this a little. I updated my archives (as you can see here and here), but I won't keep updating them in the future as WHD does a great job and my work seems a little redundant. So please Lego, hope you'll finish integrating the update lists, so Win Toolkit can download directly the needed updates, and this before ~ 15 of february. So all users can enjoy patch tuesday updates / hotfixes from next month Quote
Falo Posted January 23, 2014 Posted January 23, 2014 Yes I know it's not inside Wintoolkit.I downloaded it and tried to use it, unfortunally I get a Unhandled exception always when I start it up.I have .win7 x64, net 4.5.1, 4gb ram, 130gb free on d: and 93gb free on c:I have cleared the temp, tested to move it from d: to c:, reinstalled .net.I can see that people use it to download updates (not me then).Do I need some files that is missing or does it need more than 4gb ram which sounds strange.Here are the details from the "Unhandled exception" : ************** Exception Text **************System.OutOfMemoryException: Insufficient memory to continue the execution of the program. at System.Management.ManagementScope.Initialize() at System.Management.ManagementEventWatcher.Initialize() at System.Management.ManagementEventWatcher.Start() at WindowsHotfixDownloader.SolutionHelper.TestRegistry(Object , RunWorkerCompletedEventArgs )************** Loaded Assemblies **************mscorlib Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework64/v4.0.30319/mscorlib.dll----------------------------------------WindowsHotfixDownloader Assembly Version: 5.0.0.4 Win32 Version: 5.0.0.4 CodeBase: file:///D:/Winfix/win7orig/WindowsHotfixDownloader.exe----------------------------------------System Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll----------------------------------------WindowsHotfixDownloader& Assembly Version: 1.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 5.0.0.4 CodeBase: file:///D:/Winfix/win7orig/WindowsHotfixDownloader.exe----------------------------------------System.Windows.Forms Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll----------------------------------------System.Drawing Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll----------------------------------------System.Management Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Management/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Management.dll----------------------------------------System.Configuration Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll----------------------------------------System.Xml Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll----------------------------------------System.Core Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0 Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.18408 built by: FX451RTMGREL CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Core/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Core.dll----------------------------------------************** JIT Debugging **************To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for thisapplication or computer (machine.config) must have thejitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.The application must also be compiled with debuggingenabled.For example:<configuration> <system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" /></configuration>When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exceptionwill be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computerrather than be handled by this dialog box.Does anyone have a clue?In the meantime I have downloaded RicaNeagas updatepacks (Thanks by the way) /Falo Quote
Legolash2o Posted January 23, 2014 Author Posted January 23, 2014 If I'm honest, I have no idea and I have nothing to do with that program what-so-ever. Definitely seems to be a memory leak though. Quote
Tuesday77 Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Im so happy about this integration. WHD is also a great tool and going the same way of WTK. Few questions:- Would it will be a full integration?Means, supported the full (main)-functionality;Example: Can also delete superseded updates?- Whats about the update-structur of code?Means, if comes updates for WHD, comes also for WTK?- Whats about integrate .UL list?Or can i convert UL into .xml and "hard" integrate?(My dream would be a mega updatelist, thats the result of work of all update-Repo makers. Or for alternative i can adding xmls from all repo maker, so i can choice what i want download.) Quote
ianymaty Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 I don't think a full integrate will be the best choice and frankly who would ever want that? I was thinking that WTK will have acces to the updates repo of WHD and after some time of lacking it it finally have an built in updates downloader. That's all it needs in my opinion from WHD. Who wants the other features of WHD, just use it as separate program. Quote
Legolash2o Posted January 28, 2014 Author Posted January 28, 2014 I've currently got it to the point where you can actually download updates, etc.. At the moment it looks exactly like the old Update Catalogue. It will only use the same update lists. That's all. Quote
janrockt Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Great news, I definitely prefer your GUI! Quote
Tuesday77 Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 (edited) Oh.. mh.. Okay.Was thinking that.But then its not a "replacing", its "just" an updated existing update-catalog feature. I would miss some functions, and i think some of them would be usefull also for existing update-catalog.Example this "delete superseds" or this selecting-menus in newer versions, filter-options, and more...(Im not meaning the other [same] stuff like convert msp etc, im just meaning the update-downloader-frame)Yay, at the end its a thing of taste - may.But no good news for me.. Update:Or i do not right remember?Have WTK original Update-Catalog for example this "right-click-on-list"-feature from WHD? Edited January 28, 2014 by BrokenZer0 Quote
ianymaty Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 As I remember it the update catalog worked better than current WHD implementation. For ex: 1. The new updates were auto-selected and presented on top of the list 2. All supersedded updates that are not in the curent list were moved to "Old" folder That's what I still remember and wish they remain the same. janrockt 1 Quote
Tuesday77 Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Okay thats sound good.May i make request-post then for "mark all additional" example and still keep as wish. But lets see whats the final implementation result, we waiting for Lego. Quote
bphlpt Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 @BrokenZero, As ianymaty said, new updates should be auto-selected. If an update is superseded, then why on earth would you want to keep it anyway? Having it moved to the "Old" folder is best, IMHO. You will still have it available if you ever need to use it at a later time, but Win Toolkit would not integrate it anyway, AFAIK, so that seems the best approach. Or did I misunderstand what you meant by "mark all additional". Cheers and Regards Quote
Tuesday77 Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 @bphlptUnfortunately yes, you did misunderstand.My mistake, may i have to really proof my english texting. Yea, in first i was thinking that no option for unselect/delete superseds exist in Update-Catalog-Tool (UCT).Then ianymaty have tell me correct that UCT have already this option.So i told that i may make a request - for other - things.For example, this "mark all additionals"-feature.Additionals means all extra downloads, like "Additional Updates" or "Extra Updates" from WHD Update list. Quote
ianymaty Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Everything that's in the repo will be downloadable through update catalog, don't worry. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.