Jump to content

[14 janvier 2020] Update list GDR pour Windows 7 SP1 x86/x64 (Fr-En-De-Es-It)


Recommended Posts

@icare

Ah bon j'avais mal compris, je laisse donc le "z" devant cette mise à jour !

Pour le pack SP1, c'est malheureusement la même rengaine, ce la signifie que KB2533552 ne s'est pas bien installée, ou alors c'est celle qui lui fait suite (KB3042058 si je me rappelle bien). J'ai souvent des soucis avec le Wintoolkit installer en x86, il plante une fois sur trois, et tout ne s'installe pas comme il faut (du coup je regarde à la fin du premier boot si tous les SFX et les KB en Runonce se sont bien installés). Lorsque j'ai testé la semaine dernière, je n'ai pas eu de bug, et rien ne m'a été demandé par WU.

@Thiersee,

Thank you for the infos. But I'm not boxing in the same category as you, since my SSD is too small to contain Wintoolkit_mount folder, I'll stay with the standard integration...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cette histoire d'erreur SFC m'embête (personnellement je m'en fiche, mais cela peut être handicapant pour certains).

Quelqu'un connait-il par hasard le moyen de lancer un batch en tant qu'administrateur pour lancer sfc / scannow en fin d'installation (donc en gros après le SFX W10.exe) ? et bien sûr en tant qu'administrateur pour pouvoir tout corriger ?

Edited by rhahgleuhargh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Pink_Freud

Hello ! I'm very interested to experiment setupcomplete.cmd. It reminds me the RunOnce process of Windows XP, and it was very fun.

What does contain this .cmd file ? I suppose you just have to create a $oem$ folder and place all required files in it as it was the case with XP ?

Edited by rhahgleuhargh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@rhahgleuhargh Yes you create the directories in "sources" folder as such: \sources\$oem$\$$\Setup\scripts\ place setupcomplete.cmd & any KB's in 'scripts' folder. 

This works for me for 7 KB's I listed above in the order listed; you could tweak as needed
 

@echo off
cd %~dp0
start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB2533552-x64.msu /quiet /norestart
start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB971033-x64.MSU /quiet /norestart
start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB2603229-x64.msu /quiet /norestart
start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB3046269-x64.msu /quiet /norestart
start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB3020369-x64.msu /quiet /norestart
start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB3042058-x64.msu /quiet /norestart
start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB3112343-x64.msu /quiet /norestart
RMDIR /S /Q "C:\Windows\Setup\Scripts"
exit 

HTH :)
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

just a "strange" request from WU:

since yesterday KB2919469 (nov. 2014!) is requested by WU as important on ALL my newly (16.01.16) installed PCs,

no matter if VM or real HW, 32- or 64-bit, HomePremium or Professional, German or Italian!

I'm 100% sure it was not requested after installation (on test installation I make always a deep cleaning and a new search after rebooting).

On my work-pc and on my wife's laptop (both installed 3-4 month ago) this update is not requested!

Someone the same?

Used UL: 12.01.2016.

BTW, KB3102429 is proposed again by WU as optional.

Regards, Thiersee

Edited by Thiersee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, rhahgleuhargh said:

Hello,

I think it's because KB3102429 has been updated to v2, new links just came out. Try to install the new one and KB2919469 will probably not be asked again (I can't connect to WUCatalog website from my work, I'll check later). I'll update ULs tomorrow.

Regarding KB3102429 it's OK it is the -v2.

But what has KB2919469 (my question) to do with KB3102429 ???

Thiersee

 

P.S.: may be you 've to update the w10.vbs (KB3121461).

Edited by Thiersee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll check which update replaced KB2919469 (Canada Country code problem). Not possible until this evening. But in MDL forum abbodi1406 wrote that KB3102429 doesn't superseed KB2919469 anymore. I'll put it back in ULs.

For KB3121461, it's not asked if you don't install KB2952664 (allready in the script), so no need to add it in the script.

Edited by rhahgleuhargh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, rhahgleuhargh said:

Hello,

Effectivement, on peut créer un SFX qui se lance en administrateur. Voici un script à intégrer après W10.exe qui lance sfc /scannow et place sur le bureau le compte-rendu d'erreurs.

SFC.7z

Avast throws false positive ^_^ 

 

threat.JPG

VT 3/53 https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/5cb80faed37361ed57a33772aebac9bfd8abe161b551da532c3d9942fb9bf75e/analysis/1453384404/

Edited by Pink_Freud
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bonjour,

j'ai testé le dernier SFC.exe.
Pour moi, c'est bon en x86 (mais pas de log) mais échec en x64.
Pas vraiment de surprise, car en x64, un batch ne fait pas toujours ce que l'on souhaite.
De plus, j'ai renoncé à Bat to Exe depuis un certain temps à cause des faux positifs.

Je suis en train de tester un nouveau SFX RunOnce.
En particulier, j'y ai remis les 4 KB (5 en x64) à faire en Silent Installs + SFX
Il semble que du coup la KB2533552 s'installe correctement (à vérifier en multipliant les tests : déjà 3 en x86).
Pour sfc /scannow, il faut le faire avant les 4 ou 5 KB car sfc ne fonctionne pas lorsqu'un redémarrage est en attente.


Je propse donc un SFX qui dans une fenêtre DOS non masqué :
sfc /scannow avec log sur le bureau (personnellement je n'ai pas d'erreurs)
installe les 4 ou 5 KB
MU proposé par mooms
installation du Catalogue Microsoft Update
un nettoyage (prefetch, Windows\Temp et dossier temporaire de l'utilisateur) au redémarrage suivant

on peut aussi ajouter le masquage des KB W10

@+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On ‎13‎/‎06‎/‎2014 at 4:30 PM, Thiersee said:

No problem ;).

My experience is to have a look in both the WU-Catalog AND the Security Bulletins because sometimes there are differences :sad01_anim: !

 

For me too!

 

Yes, I know, I found this KB in the list from WHD, but as I said I don't know a link for it; if I download the hotfix I get a link fro MS (per email).

I tried already to integrate those extracted .msu, but WinToolkit had problems with: extracted file and the download from WHD had different checksums...

 

On ‎13‎/‎06‎/‎2014 at 4:30 PM, Thiersee said:

No problem ;).

My experience is to have a look in both the WU-Catalog AND the Security Bulletins because sometimes there are differences :sad01_anim: !

 

For me too!

 

Yes, I know, I found this KB in the list from WHD, but as I said I don't know a link for it; if I download the hotfix I get a link fro MS (per email).

I tried already to integrate those extracted .msu, but WinToolkit had problems with: extracted file and the download from WHD had different checksums...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...