rhahgleuhargh Posted January 19, 2016 Author Posted January 19, 2016 Merci icare pour le retour. Donc visiblement les erreurs SFC n'apparaissent que lorsqu'on utilise des tweaks. Par contre, de mon côté KB3042058 doit être déplacée manuellement vers Silent install + SFX. Quote
icare Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 Bonjour, @rhahgleuhargh, je me suis peut être mal exprimé : j'ai placé manuellement la KB3042058 dans Silent Installs + SFX. Pour les 3 autres WinToolkit le propose et il faut le confirmer. Quid de la KB976932 ? @+ Quote
Thiersee Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 Quote WU demande KB976932 3,9 Mo du 12 Feb 2015. It is KB2533552, it's not integratable offline. You can try to install KB2533552 after you installed Win7 and rebooted, the request will not appear. Regards, Thiersee Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted January 19, 2016 Author Posted January 19, 2016 @icare Ah bon j'avais mal compris, je laisse donc le "z" devant cette mise à jour ! Pour le pack SP1, c'est malheureusement la même rengaine, ce la signifie que KB2533552 ne s'est pas bien installée, ou alors c'est celle qui lui fait suite (KB3042058 si je me rappelle bien). J'ai souvent des soucis avec le Wintoolkit installer en x86, il plante une fois sur trois, et tout ne s'installe pas comme il faut (du coup je regarde à la fin du premier boot si tous les SFX et les KB en Runonce se sont bien installés). Lorsque j'ai testé la semaine dernière, je n'ai pas eu de bug, et rien ne m'a été demandé par WU. @Thiersee, Thank you for the infos. But I'm not boxing in the same category as you, since my SSD is too small to contain Wintoolkit_mount folder, I'll stay with the standard integration... Quote
Pink_Freud Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 (edited) I have 2533552 & 6 others in \sources\$oem$\$$\Setup\scripts\setupcomplete.cmd nothing asked after install.:) Edited January 19, 2016 by Pink_Freud Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted January 19, 2016 Author Posted January 19, 2016 (edited) Cette histoire d'erreur SFC m'embête (personnellement je m'en fiche, mais cela peut être handicapant pour certains). Quelqu'un connait-il par hasard le moyen de lancer un batch en tant qu'administrateur pour lancer sfc / scannow en fin d'installation (donc en gros après le SFX W10.exe) ? et bien sûr en tant qu'administrateur pour pouvoir tout corriger ? Edited January 19, 2016 by rhahgleuhargh Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted January 19, 2016 Author Posted January 19, 2016 (edited) @Pink_Freud Hello ! I'm very interested to experiment setupcomplete.cmd. It reminds me the RunOnce process of Windows XP, and it was very fun. What does contain this .cmd file ? I suppose you just have to create a $oem$ folder and place all required files in it as it was the case with XP ? Edited January 19, 2016 by rhahgleuhargh Quote
Pink_Freud Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 @rhahgleuhargh Yes you create the directories in "sources" folder as such: \sources\$oem$\$$\Setup\scripts\ place setupcomplete.cmd & any KB's in 'scripts' folder. This works for me for 7 KB's I listed above in the order listed; you could tweak as needed @echo off cd %~dp0 start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB2533552-x64.msu /quiet /norestart start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB971033-x64.MSU /quiet /norestart start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB2603229-x64.msu /quiet /norestart start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB3046269-x64.msu /quiet /norestart start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB3020369-x64.msu /quiet /norestart start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB3042058-x64.msu /quiet /norestart start /wait %systemroot%\setup\scripts\Windows6.1-KB3112343-x64.msu /quiet /norestart RMDIR /S /Q "C:\Windows\Setup\Scripts" exit HTH rhahgleuhargh 1 Quote
icare Posted January 19, 2016 Posted January 19, 2016 Bonjour, @rhahgleuhargh, lancer sfc /scannow en fin d'installation avec les droits d'adminisrateur peut être fait avec un SFX. Je teste demain @+ rhahgleuhargh 1 Quote
Thiersee Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 (edited) Hi, just a "strange" request from WU: since yesterday KB2919469 (nov. 2014!) is requested by WU as important on ALL my newly (16.01.16) installed PCs, no matter if VM or real HW, 32- or 64-bit, HomePremium or Professional, German or Italian! I'm 100% sure it was not requested after installation (on test installation I make always a deep cleaning and a new search after rebooting). On my work-pc and on my wife's laptop (both installed 3-4 month ago) this update is not requested! Someone the same? Used UL: 12.01.2016. BTW, KB3102429 is proposed again by WU as optional. Regards, Thiersee Edited January 20, 2016 by Thiersee Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted January 20, 2016 Author Posted January 20, 2016 Hello, I think it's because KB3102429 has been updated to v2, new links just came out. Try to install the new one and KB2919469 will probably not be asked again (I can't connect to WUCatalog website from my work, I'll check later). I'll update ULs tomorrow. Quote
Thiersee Posted January 20, 2016 Posted January 20, 2016 (edited) 36 minutes ago, rhahgleuhargh said: Hello, I think it's because KB3102429 has been updated to v2, new links just came out. Try to install the new one and KB2919469 will probably not be asked again (I can't connect to WUCatalog website from my work, I'll check later). I'll update ULs tomorrow. Regarding KB3102429 it's OK it is the -v2. But what has KB2919469 (my question) to do with KB3102429 ??? Thiersee P.S.: may be you 've to update the w10.vbs (KB3121461). Edited January 20, 2016 by Thiersee Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted January 20, 2016 Author Posted January 20, 2016 (edited) I'll check which update replaced KB2919469 (Canada Country code problem). Not possible until this evening. But in MDL forum abbodi1406 wrote that KB3102429 doesn't superseed KB2919469 anymore. I'll put it back in ULs. For KB3121461, it's not asked if you don't install KB2952664 (allready in the script), so no need to add it in the script. Edited January 20, 2016 by rhahgleuhargh Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted January 21, 2016 Author Posted January 21, 2016 Hello, Effectivement, on peut créer un SFX qui se lance en administrateur. Voici un script à intégrer après W10.exe qui lance sfc /scannow et place sur le bureau le compte-rendu d'erreurs. SFC.7z Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted January 21, 2016 Author Posted January 21, 2016 Reupload des ULs. Changelog : Additional updates : KB3102429 passe en v2 et devient optionnelle (suppression de la version de 12/2015). Updates : réintégration de KB2919469 de 02/2014. Quote
Pink_Freud Posted January 21, 2016 Posted January 21, 2016 (edited) 27 minutes ago, rhahgleuhargh said: Hello, Effectivement, on peut créer un SFX qui se lance en administrateur. Voici un script à intégrer après W10.exe qui lance sfc /scannow et place sur le bureau le compte-rendu d'erreurs. SFC.7z Avast throws false positive VT 3/53 https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/5cb80faed37361ed57a33772aebac9bfd8abe161b551da532c3d9942fb9bf75e/analysis/1453384404/ Edited January 21, 2016 by Pink_Freud Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted January 21, 2016 Author Posted January 21, 2016 Just now, Pink_Freud said: Avast throws false positive Hi, This occurs often when I make a SFX with WinRAR. I'll try to find the way to make it with 7zip. You can DL it without any problem, I just tested it. Pink_Freud 1 Quote
mooms Posted January 21, 2016 Posted January 21, 2016 @rhahgleuhargh: Pour transformer un bat/cmd en exe tu peux utiliser ça, c'est mieux que WinRAR ou 7zip: http://www.f2ko.de/en/b2e.php edit: Je viens de voir que l'auteur propose la même chose pour les VBS: http://www.f2ko.de/en/v2e.php rhahgleuhargh 1 Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted January 21, 2016 Author Posted January 21, 2016 (edited) Merci mooms, Je connaissais ce programme, mais j'avais oublié qu'on pouvait rendre le bat déclenchable en tant qu'administrateur ! Voici donc le fichier ! SFC.7z EDIT : le programme propose la création d'un fichier 32 ou 64 bit. J'ai opté pour le 32 bit. Edited January 21, 2016 by rhahgleuhargh Quote
icare Posted January 22, 2016 Posted January 22, 2016 Bonjour, j'ai testé le dernier SFC.exe. Pour moi, c'est bon en x86 (mais pas de log) mais échec en x64. Pas vraiment de surprise, car en x64, un batch ne fait pas toujours ce que l'on souhaite. De plus, j'ai renoncé à Bat to Exe depuis un certain temps à cause des faux positifs. Je suis en train de tester un nouveau SFX RunOnce. En particulier, j'y ai remis les 4 KB (5 en x64) à faire en Silent Installs + SFX Il semble que du coup la KB2533552 s'installe correctement (à vérifier en multipliant les tests : déjà 3 en x86). Pour sfc /scannow, il faut le faire avant les 4 ou 5 KB car sfc ne fonctionne pas lorsqu'un redémarrage est en attente. Je propse donc un SFX qui dans une fenêtre DOS non masqué : sfc /scannow avec log sur le bureau (personnellement je n'ai pas d'erreurs) installe les 4 ou 5 KB MU proposé par mooms installation du Catalogue Microsoft Update un nettoyage (prefetch, Windows\Temp et dossier temporaire de l'utilisateur) au redémarrage suivant on peut aussi ajouter le masquage des KB W10 @+ Quote
janitou Posted February 2, 2016 Posted February 2, 2016 On 13/06/2014 at 4:30 PM, Thiersee said: No problem . My experience is to have a look in both the WU-Catalog AND the Security Bulletins because sometimes there are differences :sad01_anim: ! For me too! Yes, I know, I found this KB in the list from WHD, but as I said I don't know a link for it; if I download the hotfix I get a link fro MS (per email). I tried already to integrate those extracted .msu, but WinToolkit had problems with: extracted file and the download from WHD had different checksums... On 13/06/2014 at 4:30 PM, Thiersee said: No problem . My experience is to have a look in both the WU-Catalog AND the Security Bulletins because sometimes there are differences :sad01_anim: ! For me too! Yes, I know, I found this KB in the list from WHD, but as I said I don't know a link for it; if I download the hotfix I get a link fro MS (per email). I tried already to integrate those extracted .msu, but WinToolkit had problems with: extracted file and the download from WHD had different checksums... Quote
Thiersee Posted February 2, 2016 Posted February 2, 2016 @janitou What are you trying to say??? Thiersee Quote
Thiersee Posted February 2, 2016 Posted February 2, 2016 Hi, just now received two optional requests from WU: KB2952664 (again...........) KB3135445 (it could be W10-related). Thiersee Quote
rhahgleuhargh Posted February 3, 2016 Author Posted February 3, 2016 (edited) Hello, KB2952664 v16, KB3135445 is an update for WU client. Let's wait next update patch, they will probably become important. Edited February 3, 2016 by rhahgleuhargh Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.