May 17, 201410 yr Author So more in likely it's a bug in the installer for 64 bit. i used versions all the way down to 1.4 35 to 1.4.38.7 an there an installer bug in all of them
May 17, 201410 yr I intend to edit something in WinToolkit registry, I will come back after edit , to let you know what's happened !
May 17, 201410 yr Hmm, it's from inside the compiler WinToolkit,something's call the wrong answer to WinToolkit in the registry or NOT calling at all ! :g:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\WIM_Software\WinToolkit]
May 17, 201410 yr Hi Liam, it's kind of strange thing, because in x86 it works, only with x64 does not !
May 17, 201410 yr yes, today ! but still got the same issue... it skip RunOnce ! the config is the same as always ? or is modified ? this is mine which is working in x86 but not in x64 [Config]INSTALLDIR=%DVD%:\WinToolkit_AppsDRIVERDIR=Sources\Drivers Edited May 17, 201410 yr by © KEiGHT
May 17, 201410 yr I may have fixed the error related to this: http://www.wincert.net/forum/topic/12270-win-tool-kit-run-once-installer-in-win-7-64-bit/?p=107698 Thanks for the error log, it was very useful
May 18, 201410 yr Author I can confirm that the latest test build works on 64 bit the installer work perfectly thank you very much.
May 18, 201410 yr Good Morning fellows, If I just open the wim image with the last version and save image in wim registry editor, will work ?
May 18, 201410 yr nope, but I have a question till I find it myself !?if just I manage to load in the compiler without adding any other stuff or loading presets, the program will keep all my stuff added before, right ?Right now I do this experiment ! Edited May 18, 201410 yr by © KEiGHT
May 18, 201410 yr Does not start RunOnce neither with this ! pffLiam, did you modified the Install.ini at => INSTALLDIR=??? my example : 00004| 04 Adobe Flash Player ActiveX 13.0.0.214 |%DVD%:\WinToolkit_Apps\04_Adobe_Flash_Player_ActiveX_13.0.0.214\Adobe_Flash_Player_ActiveX_13.0.0.214.exe*-install is there any fault if I put numbers in front of apps like we see up in that line? in x86 it works in any case ! Edited May 18, 201410 yr by © KEiGHT
May 18, 201410 yr I saw that on last compilation .. pff, I will start again with all-inthe problem is , cuz none of the updates was installed if I don't specified to be integrated even those are integrated before! That's a big mistake I guess ! Edited May 18, 201410 yr by © KEiGHT
May 18, 201410 yr in your x64 build are you messing with services? i found out that some service disable the runonce on my x64 build but the same ini used on x86 works without a problem.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.