hngovr1 Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 (edited) I used Neo's .res, and Rick's installation on the SP3 RC1 3264 kernels. http://mihd.net/jmgbv8MD5: 0969383A1C5AFBE1C5BC50EFBB8A76042.01 MB*updated 12/23/07* allthough there was no problem with the last version, the KB940322 entrys were unessecery. they have been removed. thanks to bober and rick for letting me know.Build 3282:http://www.mediafire.com/?ftm7gjm3cmuMD5: F16326E658149072E5728410B8D8C7E11.80 MBBuild 3300:http://mihd.net/5x03i1MD5: 66CD83D63ADE2D3925012F9D8896C4352.00 MBbuild 3311 can be found at MSFN:http://www.msfn.org/board/AddOn-Vista-RTM-...11-t113229.htmlbuild 5503 (rebuilt):http://www.mediafire.com/?wllem01voxdMD5: E7C6060E1D23DEC42DE3EC8C058E8F511.31 MBbuild 5508 (rebuilt 4/3/08)http://www.mediafire.com/?iwvxmwxthnmMD5: A59722DDBBEA67499367CFDC4C92653E2.01 MB Edited April 3, 2008 by hngovr1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsenellenelvian Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Ummmmmmmmmmmmmm PIC?!?!?!?!?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted December 22, 2007 Author Share Posted December 22, 2007 ok....looks just like rest of em.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runningfool Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 so this works on XP x64, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 i would assume that x64 uses different kernels, but give it a shot... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bober Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 (edited) so this works on XP x64, right?what makes you think these are x64 files? and i wouldint try this on an x64 system..lol just comon logic.ok and thers problems with this addon, ure adding KB940322 's cat info and reg entries instead ofSP3 RC1 3264...u might want to change this, shouldint be that hard.....not evrything cant be copyed over and concidred a clean way to install(update) a new hotfix from an older one. Edited December 23, 2007 by bober Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 (edited) like i said, just used Rick's method of install. do you think it would interfere with other hotfixes? please dont refer to it as a "problem", its not, the addon works fine. Edited December 23, 2007 by hngovr1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 what makes you think these are x64 files? and i wouldint try this on an x64 system..lol just comon logic.ok and thers problems with this addon, ure adding KB940322 's cat info and reg entries instead ofSP3 RC1 3264...u might want to change this, shouldint be that hard.....not evrything cant be copyed over and concidred a clean way to install(update) a new hotfix from an older one.could you be more clear? i'm not seeing the problem. rick's addon wasnt working with the sp3 kernels. this works perfectly for sp3 rc 3264.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bober Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 (edited) realy its quite simple,the files are registered as KB940322 , but they are infact newer and are part from an other KB.and like i said, the way i explain would be the PROPER way of doing things.i dont want to hurt anyone by explaining this.sorry if ure offended.EDIT: and ithink WU will prolly detect that the KB hotfix concerning these files isint installed on the system,thus prolly makign the user re-dl the hotfix and replacing the mod'ed files by originals.but remember that i said this addon had problems,never said it wouldint work on first try. Edited December 23, 2007 by bober Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 realy its quite simple,the files are registered as KB940322 , but they are infact newer and are part from an other KB.and like i said, the way i explain would be the PROPER way of doing things.i dont want to hurt anyone by explaining this.sorry if ure offended.EDIT: and ithink WU will prolly detect that the KB hotfix concerning these files isint installed on the system,thus prolly makign the user re-dl the hotfix and replacing the mod'ed files by originals.but remember that i said this addon had problems,never said it wouldint work on first try.i'll test that theroy, but it never happened with rick's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bober Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 well rick's worked cause it WAS for KB940322, urs is for an other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 realy its quite simple,the files are registered as KB940322 , but they are infact newer and are part from an other KB.and like i said, the way i explain would be the PROPER way of doing things.i dont want to hurt anyone by explaining this.sorry if ure offended.EDIT: and ithink WU will prolly detect that the KB hotfix concerning these files isint installed on the system,thus prolly makign the user re-dl the hotfix and replacing the mod'ed files by originals.but remember that i said this addon had problems,never said it wouldint work on first try.sorry mate, windows update ISNT complaining about KB940322. it works fine. i suggest that in the future, you TEST an addon before you post complaints of "problems", and "not passing windows update". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bober Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 urgh nevermind lol.u dont get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runningfool Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 bootscreen replacement addons work if:1) you integrate it LAST, and in a separate nlite session2) you disable system file protection and manually replace the fileskeep in mind that any windows updates involving these files will cause the bootscreen to revert back to normal. also, this addon is NOT for 64-bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 bootscreen replacement addons work if:1) you integrate it LAST, and in a separate nlite session2) you disable system file protection and manually replace the fileskeep in mind that any windows updates involving these files will cause the bootscreen to revert back to normal. also, this addon is NOT for 64-bit.yeah, you always want to disable SFC when using modded files, but you shouldnt have to manually replace the files. also i have never had any problems integrating at any point, and with other addons. i'd also like to point out, that this intended for SP3 RC1 3264 users.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted December 23, 2007 Author Share Posted December 23, 2007 urgh nevermind lol.u dont get it.i apologize, bober, you were right. i had rick take a look and, although the previous version worked fine, the KB940322 entrys were not needed. i was a little confused by what you meant, but thanks for bringing it to my attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bober Posted December 23, 2007 Share Posted December 23, 2007 im glad you took it uppon ureself to understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tap52384 Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeaNut Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 (edited) This one worked for me only after using the latest (v1.3f) SFC_OS patch with XP x86 SP3 RC1 b3264. Works flawlessly! Thanks for the add-on!For those with SP3 RC1 b3264, use this patch with RVM integrator for this bootscreen to work properly (Posted by Zacam on RyanVM forums):http://zacam.ueuo.com/rvm/PatchAddon_SFC_OS_v13f.7z(Original post link: http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2274) Edited January 6, 2008 by PeaNut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted January 6, 2008 Author Share Posted January 6, 2008 This one worked for me only after using the latest (v1.3f) SFC_OS patch with XP x86 SP3 RC1 b3264. Works flawlessly! Thanks for the add-on!For those with SP3 RC1 b3264, use this patch with RVM integrator for this bootscreen to work properly (Posted by Zacam on RyanVM forums):http://zacam.ueuo.com/rvm/PatchAddon_SFC_OS_v13f.7z(Original post link: http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2274)thanks peanut, i hadnt tested with RVM integrator. good to know about the sfc patch.i also just did a blue task manager for SP3 RC1 3264, if anyones interested... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeaNut Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 (edited) Yay! :thumbsup_anim: I'm willing to test the blue taskman @ SP3 RC1 b3264. If you don't want to post the link publicly send me a PM please!Thanks in advance!PS: I use RVM integrator most of the time, it somehow produces more "clean" installation source as nlite (at least for all test i made), i only use nlite for component/service-removal and some unattended options (and to set default desktop theme other than windows defaults). Edited January 6, 2008 by PeaNut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hngovr1 Posted January 6, 2008 Author Share Posted January 6, 2008 just sent you the link. should work with RVM integrator as well.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeaNut Posted January 6, 2008 Share Posted January 6, 2008 (edited) I have received and downloaded it, thanks. Integrated it with RVM Integrator 1.5RC1, no errors/warnings.Install went flawlessly, and its relieving to see the blue colored task mananer, it just simply blue and looks fantastic, even the system tray icon is blue!For those who want to see it in action, here it is:Screenshot of XP SP3 RC1 build3264 with blue Task Manager (addon made by hngovr1/tum0r) Edited January 6, 2008 by PeaNut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosbsas Posted January 25, 2008 Share Posted January 25, 2008 any chance of getting the german files for thatRuben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dude-uk Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 (edited) will this work on the new sp3 3282 RCR2 Edited January 28, 2008 by dude-uk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.