Posted August 28, 200816 yr Hi guys,I need a favor from all of you who opened this topic. We'll have to test ping response times on two servers and I need your help on this.So here's what you should do..Open a command prompt (Start-->Run-->CMD+Enter)Type ping 69.73.170.7, write down this info: Minimum = xx ms, Maximum = xx ms, Average = xx msRepeat the action for the second addressType ping 209.172.60.147, write down this info: Minimum = xx ms, Maximum = xx ms, Average = xx msCheck and paste your results here.Please help us check the server latency in this way.Thank you all.Server 69.73.170.7Ping statistics for 69.73.170.7:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 162ms, Maximum = 168ms, Average = 165msServer 209.172.60.147Ping statistics for 209.172.60.147:Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 173ms, Average = 171ms
August 28, 200816 yr 69.73.170.7min - 35max - 38average - 36209.172.60.147min - 40max- 41average - 40
August 28, 200816 yr Author @agliAre you satisfied with the site overall speed? Did you notice any difference with this new host?
August 28, 200816 yr @agliAre you satisfied with the site overall speed? Did you notice any difference with this new host?I have 768 kbit adsl and in the apartment powerline adapter on current network and directly to the router.
August 28, 200816 yr Author I have 768 kbit adsl and in the apartment powerline adapter on current network and directly to the router.ok, but how are you satisfied with the site speed?
August 28, 200816 yr Its ok.I am satisfied with the construction sites. Edited August 28, 200816 yr by agli
August 28, 200816 yr Ping statistics for 69.73.170.7: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 234ms, Maximum = 413ms, Average = 315msPing statistics for 209.172.60.147: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 214ms, Maximum = 301ms, Average = 267msThere ya go Edited August 28, 200816 yr by Mr.Thunderbird
August 28, 200816 yr Ping statistics for 69.73.170.7: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 14msPing statistics for 209.172.60.147: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = -35ms, Average = 28ms
August 28, 200816 yr Author Ping statistics for 69.73.170.7: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 15ms, Average = 14msPing statistics for 209.172.60.147: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = -35ms, Average = 28msOMG, Jonnyboy, servers are probably next door to you
August 28, 200816 yr 69.73.170.7 Min:129ms Max: 136ms Average:132ms209.172.60.147 Min:132ms Max: 170ms Average:143msSpeed is great!
August 29, 200816 yr C:\Users\Ricardo>ping 69.73.170.7Pinging 69.73.170.7 with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 69.73.170.7: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=57Reply from 69.73.170.7: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=57Reply from 69.73.170.7: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=57Reply from 69.73.170.7: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=57Ping statistics for 69.73.170.7: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 55ms, Average = 50msC:\Users\Ricardo>ping 209.172.60.147Pinging 209.172.60.147 with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 209.172.60.147: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=45Reply from 209.172.60.147: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=45Reply from 209.172.60.147: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=45Reply from 209.172.60.147: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=45Ping statistics for 209.172.60.147: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 75ms, Maximum = 84ms, Average = 80ms
August 29, 200816 yr Author N1K see this its not good? whyAre you behind the proxy or maybe you have blocked ping command on the firewall. But don't worry, you wouldn't be able to access site if this is the reasl problem
August 29, 200816 yr N1K my resultsPing statistics for 69.73.170.7: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 186ms, Maximum = 444ms, Average = 365msPing statistics for 209.172.60.147: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 231ms, Maximum = 457ms, Average = 351ms
August 31, 200816 yr Pretty good!Ping statistics for 69.73.170.7: Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 29ms, Maximum = 1200ms, Average = 75msPing statistics for 209.172.60.147: Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 277ms, Average = 90msNo issues with speed at this time. Very quick. Edited August 31, 200816 yr by war59312
September 6, 200816 yr OMG, Jonnyboy, servers are probably next door to you I had to try several times before I got a non-negative number. I kept saying WTF, this can't be right!Pinging 209.172.60.147 with 32 bytes of data:Reply from 209.172.60.147: bytes=32 time=-91ms TTL=46Reply from 209.172.60.147: bytes=32 time=-92ms TTL=46Reply from 209.172.60.147: bytes=32 time=-83ms TTL=46Reply from 209.172.60.147: bytes=32 time=-92ms TTL=46Ping statistics for 209.172.60.147: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = -92ms, Maximum = -83ms, Average = 1073741734ms Edited September 6, 200816 yr by Jonnyboy
September 6, 200816 yr Here's mine:ping 209.172.60.147209.172.60.147 yoklanıyor 32 bayt veri ile: 209.172.60.147 cevabı: bayt=32 s
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.