Posted January 28, 201213 yr WT7 constantly shows me kb2603229-x64 to download but never recognizes that it's already there.
January 28, 201213 yr KB2603229 should only be installed after windows installation. W7T already moves it to the silent installers section (hopefully this hasn't changed in the latest build). Can't understand what your problem is.
January 28, 201213 yr Author sorry I should have been clearer... need more coffee :-)When I do the SoLor SP1 Updates downloads, I select my folder and then Win 7 x64...it searches for all the updates and ALWAYS tells me I need KB2603229 Edited January 28, 201213 yr by compstuff
January 30, 201213 yr Are you talking about when you check things against an existing live system that is already up to date? I'm confused.Cheers and Regards
January 30, 201213 yr Author No... this is a clean initial setup with WT7 from a working technet ISO... no ANYTHING except looking to check SoLoR updates after selecting my file source.I come from some old world techniques and I ALWAYS prepare a new and clean mount from my ISO and do a SoLoR update and then use a copied version of that updated mount to THEN do my Mass Storage and CPU drivers... then I make a copy of THAT mount and use the copy for tweaks etc. Thats my testing method from doing HUNDREDS of tests with RVMI and Driver Packs.SO once again this was a untouched extraction of files from my ISO and then selecting it. Edited January 30, 201213 yr by compstuff
January 30, 201213 yr I can actually reproduce this but i don't know what's causing this. I'm going to look at this now EDIT: Found the problem, the update is on SoLoR update server twice, i've notified SoLoR on his forum and hopefully the issue will be resolved. Edited January 30, 201213 yr by Legolash2o
January 31, 201213 yr I come from some old world techniques and I ALWAYS prepare a new and clean mount from my ISO and do a SoLoR update and then use a copied version of that updated mount to THEN do my Mass Storage and CPU drivers... then I make a copy of THAT mount and use the copy for tweaks etc. Thats my testing method from doing HUNDREDS of tests with RVMI and Driver Packs.I totally agree that this is the absolute best way to do things, especially while trying to fine tune or trouble shoot things. Takes more space but isolates issues and saves time in the long run. Sorry for misunderstanding.Cheers and Regards
January 31, 201213 yr Author Oh My NO need to apologize... I appreciate the feedback and support... after all thats what makes a great support forum and this is certainly a great tool and I look forward to its continuing development. I have done literally years of testing and using Driverpacks and RVMI which is why I recognize many names on here. From what I see of this so far it seems like a tool I may be using for the next few years I totally agree that this is the absolute best way to do things, especially while trying to fine tune or trouble shoot things. Takes more space but isolates issues and saves time in the long run. Sorry for misunderstanding.Cheers and Regards
February 21, 201213 yr Author I have tried a dozen different tests on this but I am still experirenincing the same issue with this update always showing as a new update when I use .98 but not with .96... does anyone else have this problem?
February 21, 201213 yr it's because the update appears twice on the server, i'll do a quick fix now so it will not show on the next version because this update appearing all the time annoys me too EDIT: Sorted... Edited February 21, 201213 yr by Legolash2o
_14e30a.png)
_8126ce.png)
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.