SoLoR Hotfixes Failed in Red

[compstuff]

I used the preset and the same 336 hotfixes but I am using the latest release and a different base image... After the integration it shows 333 integrated and the red errors during installation...

http://clip2net.com/s/1KzEd

I am going to run another test with my original image but it takes 2hrs for this to integrate using my laptop...

[Legolash2o]

is that all of the Red errors or is there more?

3 of them are NFS (Only applicable in special cases)

1 of them is for UNIX-based applications

2 of them probably need something else installed first, ill google them

KB2636613: Windows-TerminalServices-RemoteApplication (LDR only)

KB2519946: synth3dvsc.inf

UPDATE: http://forums.mydigi...ll=1#post379755 and http://forums.mydigitallife.info/threads/19461-Windows-Hotfix-repository?p=379763&viewfull=1#post379763

Edited March 29, 2012 by Legolash2o

[RicaNeaga]

For me until now red is the IE9 x64 msu, KB917607, KB943790 and KB971033.

[Legolash2o]

ignore the red IE9, the detection doesnt fully work

[compstuff]

Those are the same I installed using T20 and a different image and they showed installed... so it will take me sometime to test a few scenarios

I took the same image and selected just those 6 updates to install and none of them installed

I am still reading the links you provided

is that all of the Red errors or is there more?

3 of them are NFS (Only applicable in special cases)

1 of them is for UNIX-based applications

2 of them probably need something else installed first, ill google them

KB2636613: Windows-TerminalServices-RemoteApplication (LDR only)

KB2519946: synth3dvsc.inf

UPDATE: http://forums.mydigi...ll=1#post379755 and http://forums.mydigi...ll=1#post379763

[compstuff]

EDITED:

I have been installing Windows6.1-KB982861-x64.msu and IE9-Windows6.1-KB2647516-x64.msu separately in a single step on a vanilla image and they have not given me any trouble

For me until now red is the IE9 x64 msu, KB917607, KB943790 and KB971033.

Edited March 29, 2012 by compstuff

[Legolash2o]

An update it needed must of been installed then

[RicaNeaga]

Windows update cabs were also in red... and they shouldn't.

In the end, maybe this red/green bars visual-only feature isn't very useful, considering those red bars can scare people away, and it has nothing with W7T, since DISM alone may be to blame.

However, I do have one curiosity. My habit before W7T forced me to do otherwise was to always integrate IE9 msu the last... I used to rename it, by putting a ''z'' letter in front. Can you please send me Legolash a beta build without that always-install-first-IE9-msu feature? I'm curious to see if the red bar applies again to IE9...

Edited March 29, 2012 by RicaNeaga

[Legolash2o]

The red bar thing for IE9 is normal, i was expecting that! I haven't added the proper detection code for it, to be honest i think im gonna get rid of the red/green bar thing

[compstuff]

I edited my above response to RicaNeaga since I think I may have been confusing

An update it needed must of been installed then

[compstuff]

WAIT :-) I think it is really helpful... remember I had asked for a log to help determine what did and didn't install because I could never easily figure out the failed differences but this has certainly helped.

The red bar thing for IE9 is normal, i was expecting that! I haven't added the proper detection code for it, to be honest i think im gonna get rid of the red/green bar thing

[Legolash2o]

The strange thing is i'm installing my updates in alphabetical order and they all seem to be going green So ordering them by KB may be the solution

[Legolash2o]

Update: After installing all updates in alphabetical order, i integrated 336 and at the end 339 was integrated with nothing red

I'm going to test integrating everything in descending order and see what happens

[compstuff]

Here's my update:

Fresh integration's of just IE9 Windows6.1-KB982861-x64.msu and IE9-Windows6.1-KB2647516-x64.msu using my TechNet ENT x64 image

1.4.0.T20 TechNet ie9 OK shows 4 updates

http://clip2net.com/s/1KCnA

401.3 TechNet

http://clip2net.com/s/1KCra red

http://clip2net.com/s/1KCtQ shows 4 updates

Fresh integration of just IE9 Windows6.1-KB982861-x64.msu and IE9-Windows6.1-KB2647516-x64.msu using my clients ENT x64 image

401.3 CPG

http://clip2net.com/s/1KCcc

http://clip2net.com/s/1KCe8 red

http://clip2net.com/s/1KCgx shows 3 updates

[Legolash2o]

I did say that IE9 integrate WILL go red all the time no matter what, even if it integrates However i've fixed that and just fixed a massive bug

[compstuff]

I wasn't worried about the red but it clearly shows not integrated on the "CPG" image so I am downloading a new one for the client and will test it tonight also...

I did say that IE9 integrate WILL go red all the time no matter what, even if it integrates However i've fixed that and just fixed a massive bug

[Legolash2o]

OK, i've testing it and it's all fixed.

[RicaNeaga]

Used version 4 of 1.4.0 and the IE9 msu red bar is gone, I decided to move those other msu's to the switchless installer folder, so they'll be run at first logon.

However, the cabs SoLoR specifically made for DISM are beeing integrated by DISM, but W7T is adding a red bar to them, instead of a green one. You can find them here. Please fix this for next update.

[Legolash2o]

Done.

[compstuff]

Wow I'm not sure whats going on with my images... I just used a new download from my clients E-Open and did my 2 step test... IE9 and the HF worked... but when I selected the 336 updates the same red ones from above showed up... I am at a loss to understand why.

[Legolash2o]

Can you give the link to that post with the screenshots, I'm not at my computer right now.

P.S. what's e-open?

[compstuff]

Sorry for the delay I was also away after I wrote that post...

e-open is just MS licensing model for enterprise customers... same thing as Volume License https://www.microsoft.com/licensing/servicecenter/default.aspx

Here is the screenshot which is from the previous post but the same errors I just got http://clip2net.com/s/1KzEd

Clearly their seems to be some difference between my Technet image and the image MS has available for the customer... I am running more tests now and will report back

Can you give the link to that post with the screenshots, I'm not at my computer right now.

P.S. what's e-open?

[Legolash2o]

What version of Windows was you trying to integrate them into? i.e. Home Premium, Ultimate, etc..

[compstuff]

I only use x64 Enterprise English on both my Technet and my clients version

My Technet:

2.96 GB (3,182,604,288 bytes)

File Name: en_windows_7_enterprise_with_sp1_x64_dvd_u_677651.iso

CRC32: CE09FA98 Date Published (UTC): 5/12/2011 2:30:00 PM

MD5: 6467C3875955DF4514395F0AFCAAA62A

SHA-1: A491F985DCCFB5863F31B728DDDBEDB2FF4DF8D1

My Client Volume License that I downloaded from MS:

File: SW_DVD5_SA_Win_Ent_7w_SP1_64BIT_English_MLF_X17-27625.ISO

CRC-32: dca3cf57

MD4: 7b9530613f911741a0204f08113b0968

MD5: 8db2fa2c64160f582bd099e86dbe219f

SHA-1: 2c9774a1f48570e749e6d33c642fe8f6f7898cb0

‎Created: Thursday, ‎February ‎24, ‎2011, ‏‎3:15:47 PM

What version of Windows was you trying to integrate them into? i.e. Home Premium, Ultimate, etc..

Edited March 31, 2012 by compstuff

[Legolash2o]

Maybe those updates are not compatible with that version of windows.