oguz Posted May 20, 2012 Posted May 20, 2012 (edited) Hi @Legolash,I have some suggestions about WinKit service tab.As you know, all window services in windows are listed by default in WinKit. However, there are some services listed in WinKit that are Not Available in other windows builds such as Win7 home premium.WinKit lists all services as if they are available in all windows builds. :g: However, the below services are "Not Avaliable" in Win7 Home Premium:- Application management- BranchCache- Client for NFS- Offline files- Remote desktop services- and others etc. ...Link: http://www.blackvipe...configurations/I think it will be better if WinKit lists only available windows services for whatever windows built it is working on image. By this way WinKit will be more intuitive and will have less user errors...Thank you. Edited May 23, 2012 by oguz Quote
Legolash2o Posted May 24, 2012 Posted May 24, 2012 Not possible, it would require mounting the image first and if you have multiple images it will take way longer Quote
oguz Posted May 24, 2012 Author Posted May 24, 2012 (edited) Not possible, it would require mounting the image first and if you have multiple images it will take way longerWe cannot work with Winkit without mounting the image anyway If a service that is not available in mounted image is edited (Manuel,disable, automatic, etc.), How does Winkit reflect this process to the image? In other words, does Winkit have any intervention that can affect image stability in this type of a scenario? Edited May 24, 2012 by oguz Quote
Legolash2o Posted May 24, 2012 Posted May 24, 2012 But i'd rather not have it mount the image first, besides if a user tweaks a service which doesn't exist in the image like the ones you mentioned above, nothing will get changed regarding those tweaks. Quote
Legolash2o Posted June 6, 2012 Posted June 6, 2012 Closing thread as a no.Reason:1) Would require each image to see what services are available2) Even if a user selects a service which isn't available in that edition then it will be skipped anyway.3) Would be complicate if the user wanted to work with more than one image.4) Depending on the amounts of images selected it would take time to mount/unmount each one to get the data required. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.